Views on Military Intervention

<p>Debate has raged on when and how the US should intervene in the affairs of others. Many argue that our policy of intervention has been inconsistent during the l990s. Some argue the US has not done enough while others argue we are doing too much. Regardless of the perspective taken there are no clearly articulated criteria or policy to use in determining when the US should intervene in the affairs of another state a non-state or a trans- national group in one instance and not in another. The questions concerning intervention and flexing US power are never exactly the same and the answers are always varying shades of gray; much of the recent literature seems to describe and analyze different aspects of the problem. This paper discusses intervention. Specifically we evaluate the conditions under which the US should intervene in the affairs of another actor or actors with military force. We use moral hazard theory to guide our analysis. Obviously the US has many ways to intervene when it so chooses economically diplomatically militarily informationally culturally officially unofficially with government agencies with non- governmental organizations and the like. However military intervention has been and remains the most controversial especially since the end of the Cold War.</p><p>This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore you will see the original copyright references library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world) and other notations in the work.</p><p>This work is in the public domain in the United States of America and possibly other nations. Within the United States you may freely copy and distribute this work as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.</p><p>As a reproduction of a historical artifact this work may contain missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc. Scholars believe and we concur that this work is important enough to be preserved reproduced and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.</p>