What's Wrong With The World: a social science essay by G. K. Chesterton

Whats Wrong With The World By G. K. ChestertonRenewal of interest in the work of GK Chesterton continues apace. The writer whose career began when he dictated his first story to his aunt Rose at the age of three started early and aimed high and his intellectual development was among the more conspicuously interesting of the Edwardian age. His Orthodoxy of 1908 has become a sort of touchstone text during the present vogue for philosophical theology much cited by the likes of Slavoj Zizek and the radical theologian John Milbank while oddball novels such as The Napoleon of Notting Hill (1904) and The Man Who Was Thursday (1908) retain the power to entertain and bemuse in equal measure.This year however sees the centenary of one of his rather less high-profile publications. Whats Wrong with the World represents an extrapolation of Chestertons original response to a query posed in so many words by the Times to a selection of eminent writers and thinkers of the day. Dear Sirs ran GKs succinct rejoinder I am. The publication of the book suggested that on reflection there might have been more to say on the subject.The Chesterton offered us by his latter-day biographers and critics is a lost proto-radical if we could but make him out as such. Along with his close friend Hilaire Belloc he was the proponent of a species of Third Way politics avant la lettre a plague-on-both-your-houses confutation of capitalism and socialism known as distributism. Drastically simplified the vision was of an atomised entrepreneurialism in which as many individuals as possible pursued the goal of profit so as to wrest capital accumulation from both a few vastly powerful interests (such as Jewish banking families) and a monolithic socialist state.Whats Wrong with the World opens with an analysis of the predicament of modern humanity too obsessed in the great age of political idealism with visions of the future. Has the Enlightenment ideal of continual social progress been a reality or has it all been a piece of western myth-making? Are we still strong enough to spear mammoths but now tender enough to spare them? he wonders. But then again Does the cosmos contain any mammoth that we have either speared or spared?What it does contain is the wreckage of half-realised ideals. There is a lack of conviction in attempts to enact the radical doctrines of Christianity or of political justice and too often the espousal of great causes results in panic at the consequences of ones own actions. Where national leaders paid lip-service to such humanist ideals as egalitarianism they came to rue their faith in humanity. Joseph of Austria and Catherine of Russia quite agreed that the people should rule what horrified them was that the people did.The Guardians: The World of of GK Chesterton and whats wrong with it