WHICH IS WORSE : SLAVERY OR UNTOUCHABILITY

Ambedkar begins by defining slavery as a system that while exploitative acknowledges the humanity of the enslaved and often grants opportunities for integration or liberation. He cites historical instances where slaves could rise to positions of influence or gain freedom emphasizing that slavery though oppressive allowed for some level of social mobility and personal dignity. In contrast untouchability as practiced in India denies the basic humanity of an entire community. Untouchables (Dalits) are subjected to complete social ostracism denied access to public spaces education and even water. Ambedkar underscores how this systemic exclusion destroys self-esteem and perpetuates intergenerational poverty. He critiques the caste system as a unique form of apartheid that dehumanizes individuals at a level deeper than slavery ever could. Ambedkar concludes by arguing that untouchability is a more severe and enduring form of oppression because it is justified by religious and cultural ideologies making it harder to dismantle. This work serves as a scathing indictment of caste-based discrimination highlighting its pervasive and destructive nature while advocating for radical reform to achieve equality and justice.